A lot would go wrong.
Post by twetch#22429
Sure, but nobody is forced to take the risk. I just want the opportunity, if I get scammed eventually, it is my problem.
What the chain says
- Block
- 635 301
- Time
- 2020-05-17T09:01:45Z
- Signer
- 1P3nuztTbn1WV7WzfW16gAbMS3vEH3qhdV
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#22429
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1P3nuztTbn1WV7WzfW16gAbMS3vEH3qhdV VerifiedReplies (3)
If you accept that cognitive ability is a Pareto distribution, then you ought to advocate for the reasonable protection of the less able minded investor from the psychopathic malfeasant. This helps the society avoid the opportunity cost of bad investments.
^ Okay I really need to STFU now. I’m confusing distributions. Normal vs Pareto.
But because it wouldn’t work out for most, the investment format would fail and then you’ll end up with lemons only again.