Which leads me to a topic for discussion. Should a company be allowed to continually profit from a product that has proven to be dangerous to health? That brings up health care costs? Should we be relying on an addict to quit?
Post by twetch#17303
Well that's what you get when you make everyone pay for everyone else's "health care". Where does the control authority stop?
Here's a great way to tell if you're an authoritarian: any time you ask a question that starts with 'should X be allowed to...'
What the chain says
- Block
- 623 329
- Time
- 2020-02-23T12:35:32Z
- Signer
- 1EZKvwVyKb9LtwnHCtXAneub8w5WuoX3oL
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#17303
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1EZKvwVyKb9LtwnHCtXAneub8w5WuoX3oL VerifiedReplies (1)
Actually the correct word would have been “ Shall” and if I had any money or any power... I’m asking if making meth production profitable is ok knowing it kills people? Meth is an addiction.