Post by Actual Ayyy

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch

The absolute funniest thing about this BIP-110 nonsense is how certain these retards are about the intended purposes of Bitcoin. On both sides of the argument.

The BIP-110'ers are claiming their failure is proof of centralized control, when that proof existed almost 10 years ago re: addition of Segwit and Lightning Network. And really, further, when the temporary 1mb cap was never removed.

It's absolutely fucking astounding how delusional these people are. None of them have a clue what the point of Bitcoin is, none of them have a clue that BTC hasn't been Bitcoin basically since it's inception (because of the cap, then segwit/LN).

None of them have a clue that consensus is not some fucking magic bullet that is guaranteed to add things that are beneficial.

None of them have a clue that consensus can be gamed, in many ways.

It's really fucking astounding to witness how retarded these people are.

What a god-tier psy-op they've succumbed to.

559 734 sat
What the chain says
Block
961 746
Time
2026-08-10T20:18:31Z
Signer
18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p Unverified

Replies (2)

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

Imagine believing consensus is some kind of pure indicator of a good idea, that could never be gamed by bad actors.

You have to be extremely retarded to believe this.

16dN7q…Y45a Unverified · twetch
Replying to@18xXxq…a31p

BTCers celebrating Bitcoin isn't controlled by miners after bip110 failure. Central planning Bip110ers complaining about centralization.