Opps. Shorthand or slang for "Reactive Programming"
Post by twetch#9216
en.wikipedia.org Reactive programming - Wikipedia
It can be thought of as a mechanism by which "Physical Manipulatives" are included as part of the processing apparatus itself.
Logic gates can built out of a huge assortment of things. An FPGA can include a wide array of carrier substrates.
What the chain says
- Block
- 660 026
- Time
- 2020-11-05T23:58:21Z
- Signer
- 1Pkn99xWPjQLP3amKdzRAZ4JVRdDY8QB5w
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#9216
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Pkn99xWPjQLP3amKdzRAZ4JVRdDY8QB5w VerifiedReposted by (1)
Replies (17)
"Gate states may be treated as physical changes in the environment." Unlike "Memory on Disc" (polarization changes), both volatile and non-volatile memories involve changes which can be used to construct PHYSICAL virtual topologies.
This allows for Hyperstructural Configurations which can then be used for Subbit processing and its monumental efficiency gains. Imagine the the blockchain consuming 1:1800th of the energy it takes at present.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7313727
Example: At present, the global computing infrastructure uses "Bits" to "Gauge and Manage Charge Flows". That mindset insists that "You have to use bits to interact with charge."
That is a falsehood. We can work with charge against charge directly.
Not only that, the notion of SCADA'like Reactive Programming suggests that not only can we work with charge against charge, we can work with charge in all manner of charge carriers. Temperature, Pressure, Electricity being basic examples:
/ #thomsongate
ohhhhhhhh so this is where CGP comes in
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.