I guess porting everything to 1satordinals would be the only way
(I have absolutely no idea how or if that would even work lol)
Post by x
Can’t happen without RUN node :c
What the chain says
- Block
- 970 170
- Time
- 2026-10-08T15:15:15Z
- Signer
- 1C7ZJjaUSC2ykbFoxuNWJUpYPQ63Fi2baJ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1C7ZJjaUSC2ykbFoxuNWJUpYPQ63Fi2baJ UnverifiedReplies (10)
Does RUN have to be rebuilt from scratch or is it open source?
Good question! Run is open sourced and available on github as runoncomputer/sdk the actual db one needs to create to service a run based wallet is available at runoncomputer/run-db. It requires Node.js (I find v14.14.0 to work best) and python3. It will require some editing because at this time it calls many services that are no longer available.
There is a wallet available jdh7190/tique_case that you can freely modify to work in tandem with run-db. You can also change its config to use the same derivation path that relayx once did to use your BIP39 phrase, allowing access to your wallet.
That’s the summary of my experience. Last I used these, all the apis worked, and relay existed… it is 100% possible to regain access to a relayx wallet but everything must be built from scratch again.
Let me know when someone builds it
😎
iv been learning a lot python recently and have built some successfully things using replit. id offer to help where possible, but only for the stickdoodz revamp, and pieces from mageta sleepless and few others
altho dont know how much help I could be. not that I want relay back as such, I think @66034 and @219537 are very good marketplaces. but reviving some old relay pieces would be nice for nostalgia
Indexing is the hard point here, I ran run-db years ago and it was so painful.. if the RUN content is indexed everything is possible but the question is why we should put efforts there? We all have the 1sat protocol up and running fine.