Peck by twetch#7006

twetch#7006 6.6y

1E6cQK…PyCf Key · twetch

Shouldn't Branches cost more than Likes?

What the chain says

Transaction: 5b3b04f3e770088f95074996337c4f2120562822cb0a316fb954bd72d277e885
Block: 626 895
Time: 2020-03-19T13:23:13Z
Signer: 1E6cQK6GUKGMAfiXw5rjBK6LB1JZ59PyCf
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#7006

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1E6cQK6GUKGMAfiXw5rjBK6LB1JZ59PyCf Verified

Reposted by (1)

twetch#2022 Reposted · 6.6y

Replies (3)

twetch#2283 6.6y

18eKQ6…Tmmt Key · twetch

Replying to@1E6cQK…PyCf

Why

twetch#7006 6.6y

1E6cQK…PyCf Key · twetch

Replying to@18eKQ6…Tmmt

Just feels right to me. In the way a RT amplifies greater than a Like on Twitter, I assumed that was the point of a Branch: To amplify.

twetch#20254 6.6y

18Vhb1…aZqM Key · twetch

Replying to@1E6cQK…PyCf

I think it has to do with how payouts are made. Branches are a more direct interaction while when you like a post/comment it can get chopped up several times. As interactions grow within a post, likes subsequently become less valuable to the receiver.

Post by twetch#7006

Reposted by (1)

Replies (3)