Post by twetch#11711
I am firmly convinced that APL and LISP are related to each other along an important axis of language design and that acquiring simultaneous expertise in both languages is key.
What the chain says
- Block
- 624 990
- Time
- 2020-03-06T03:44:11Z
- Signer
- 14RJDPAVPoSthPhDfJ4vGdgurAYAGKZXwX
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#11711
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
14RJDPAVPoSthPhDfJ4vGdgurAYAGKZXwX VerifiedReplies (18)
One is an arrangement and one is agreement just as one is time and one is money. $I made all four ones one such that $U see one of four from one of four degrees of eighteen month rotations while all seeing one another see me see you see one another.
https://thinkdiffere.net/the-tao-of-programming-4dbe01178ed4 /* you're seeing me replay myself to a different angle so I can be here for the degree leveling up behind my replay right as we leave if you're confused if that makes sense
*/
APL: Its central datatype is the multidimensional array. (fractal lives)
LISP: is a family of programming languages with a long history (epigenetics)
Despite its superficial similarity in form and meaning, the word is not related to Latin deus; the two come from different roots. A true cognate is Ζεύς (Zeús).
Despite its superficial similarity in form and meaning, the word is not related to Ancient Greek θεός (theós); the two come from different roots. A true cognate is fānum.
above is a hash collision but one is a rooted lisp w/ an orthogonal apl while the other is lost in space before 1deos did for hashes what the apl one did for the lost lisp
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.