nope, nchain/BSVA/TAAL are looking for government contracts and that is all.
Post by Brooz ☕️
isnt the idea of bsv meant to be that its not tied to the government...
What the chain says
- Block
- 964 677
- Time
- 2026-08-31T05:59:57Z
- Signer
- 1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS UnverifiedReplies (7)
whats the main drive behind this in your opinion
Couldn't help myself
but i have always seen bitcoin as the opposite
and BSV even more so,
hence OP_court_sig or whatever it is called
that its meant to be peer to peer electronic cash system and cos its not government issued. I thought that was one of its main selling points
most money is not government issued anymore,
gov only issues money through the treasury
but then citizens go and create credit at the bank
and the banks run on ZERO reserve now
I get the point though
and the story given to us,
but the coin is what 90% issued already
the powers that be can easily scoop up all if they want
so issuance is not so much a thing
then we have scarcity
which is out the window with tokens
but great you did state bitcoin is meant to be a
peer to peer electronic cash system
that is something it can be
but the peer to peer part is still lacking after all these years
Handcash were on the right track initially
then they got funding and pivoted away from NFC and POP
which wallets allow Alice to send a TX to Bob by NFC or bluetooth because Alice does not have internet?
Below is how Bitcoin Peer to Peer transactions should happen
Alice sends a signed TX to Bob
Bob is then responsible for broadcasting it to the chain
you mean similar to that service where you could txt someone bsv?