Post by 19bb9e…iKjU

Unverified · twetch

What would you consider an undebiable proof?

What the chain says
Block
961 597
Time
2026-08-09T18:40:31Z
Signer
19bb9e2Rv8jZYzVeNXU7LqtH4EXmkjiKjU
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 19bb9e2Rv8jZYzVeNXU7LqtH4EXmkjiKjU Unverified

Replies (11)

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pqguf…CTad

As I said, no links please. Your words, typed by you, or nothing.

1Pqguf…CTad Unverified · twetch
Replying to@19bb9e…iKjU

visibility into a means of communications that allows a party to transcend time

1Pqguf…CTad Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pqguf…CTad

the above is a nevessary prerequisite, but not a sufficient proof

Continue thread →

This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.