Post by twetch#1828

1AKHVi…MfPE Key · twetch

Remember all that 21e8 excitement in June of 2018? So I guess they were saying time traveling Satoshi sent a message on BTC block 528249. Why not on BSV? It would be easier to swallow that whole story if it was 21e8stiff

What the chain says
Block
601 378
Time
2019-09-24T05:35:34Z
Signer
1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#1828

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1AKHViYgBGbmxi8qiJkNvoHNeDu9m3MfPE Verified

Replies (5)

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1AKHVi…MfPE

#1 BSV didn't exist yet.
#2 BTC is nearly impossible to 51% attack

The message had to be sent through the current most secure protocol.

The 21e8 hash did mention BSV though.

00 Genesis
21e8 BTC supply
00 Genesis
C1 Affirmative
*** DF Disk Free ***

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

I should have said BCH (at the time was same as BSV) So they broke BTC but have not elaborated on the point (cool). Why create a crooked path when path clear?

1JLBut…aTuZ Key · twetch
Replying to@1JLBut…aTuZ

spoken like one of them :)

Continue thread →