2 BRC or not 2 BRC 🤔
BRC-100
/poll [2 BRC,Not 2 BRC]
186 081 sat
Post by pxl
BRC-100 was hyped af a month ago, now everybody is quiet about it. doesn't it work as good as intended? do the users care about it?
184 153 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 968 442
- Time
- 2026-09-26T11:43:54Z
- Signer
- 1F5ptiZEJyLKxrJ12i11igzEiQsmdogQC3
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1F5ptiZEJyLKxrJ12i11igzEiQsmdogQC3 UnverifiedReplies (4)
it doesn't reuse addresses, thats a plus. pretty versatile wallets. I've had a look at yours and bsv desktop. the main issue is you have to manage/backup your tx data. also built a 1sat minter using the new yours brc-100 wallet. https://ord-arena-inscribe.vercel.app/
Ord Arena Inscribe Ord Arena Inscribe — Yours Wallet ordinal inscriptions Mint BSV ordinals with Yours Wallet. List, delist, and transfer inscriptions you hold. Not a store. Keys stay in the wallet. 184 153 sat
Is 1sat ready for BRC-100? isn't there a conflict between rolling addresses and having your inscriptions in one address?
184 153 sat
yes, wallet inscriptions are tracked as basket UTXOs (outpoint + derivation). maybe not all marketplaces have implemented this, i don't know.
184 153 sat
What matters is the wallet architecture and what it does in utility 🔥everything else is piping🚽 and it shouldn't matter to the user.
185 614 sat