Post by Ironshirtz

1Q7kaj…BTHS Unverified · twetch

I’m not saying everyone will suddenly start using BSV but if an agent were to look for a chain to use, it might prefer BSV over others for all the reasons we’ve always talked about.

Every blockchain except BTC is talking about x402 and micropayments.

That was unimaginable not long ago. The meta has changed and for once it favors BSV.

But not as a marketing or narrative thing. It favors it from an actual “can this chain be used” standpoint.

Who knows what that looks like in the future.

545 938 sat
1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch

Not every blockchain is talking about x402 and micropayments
some are talking about ghost ledgers for small payments keeping them off chain except for settlement
nobody needs to see agent A send 5 sats to agent B, then see agent B send 3 sats back to agent A, then agent A sends 4 sats to agent B, then agent B sends 6 sats to agent A.

Such small transactions do not need bloat any chain
let them do the back n fore off chain with a ghost ledger

#ANNE

What the chain says
Block
969 960
Time
2026-10-07T00:24:58Z
Signer
1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF Unverified

Replies (2)

1Q7kaj…BTHS Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1aUt6N…jRpF

Who controls the ghost ledger. Who verifies? What’s the uptime?

Transparency is a feature not a bug.

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Q7kaj…BTHS

ghost ledgers only exist between involved parties
involved parties verify
settlement is still on chain

*similar to payment channels