That said, taking that idea further, it could be really compelling for real-time feedback from participants in a meeting.
If you’re rambling on, intentional carrot vs stick behaviors could clue you in to wrap it up or get back on topic.
Post by twetch#7355
But automating that has ramped-up implications around data ingestion, privacy, etc.
To say nothing of the consequence or indelible mistakes. Who’s to say the capacity for a human to forgive (even if via forget), is critical for mutual reconciliation?
What the chain says
- Block
- 633 843
- Time
- 2020-05-07T15:30:45Z
- Signer
- 1J6h7Bex83EVCGvamT5LMVm9MECX4bSquW
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#7355
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1J6h7Bex83EVCGvamT5LMVm9MECX4bSquW VerifiedReplies (4)
My grandpa always told me: “You go through life with a Track Record.“
The obvious implication being if you “Stay on the Straight + Narrow” and don’t mess up, your record stays good. But if you let your foot off the gas, so to speak, you lose ground.
That’s all well and good when you’re at your first Starting Block.
But I’ve also seen + experienced how demoralizing this singular perspective can have in the face of defeat.
Everyone inevitably faces defeat.
Everyone faces setbacks.
That’s all to say zooming very far in on this sort of gamification is useful, but after the novelty, humans tend to stray from the beaten path, losing sight of what we were after when we started ‘the journey’, circling deep eddies of our creations.
Sometimes we build things that are so useful, so accessible, and so viral, that it spreads through humanity like wildfire, igniting amazing creativity + ingenuity.
But this creates a necessary ‘stagnant ubiquity’.
There are inevitably hidden costs.