they're actually a very clumbsy set of equations to work with,and the reason is because they're expressing relationships that would apply if we had an aether
Post by twetch#4355
so if one thinks instead about one electron interacting w/ another electron — massive numbers of them interacting — then you would start where that started, and the simplist thing to start w/ is this thing called a superconductor
twetch#4355 6.0y
if there's no interference, superconductivity is the natural intrinsic condition of matter
https://twetch.app/t/577b88842e17613a394c4f6f2717d08dbac3656f424ccb8bb4587044d3bd14e4
What the chain says
- Block
- 657 779
- Time
- 2020-10-21T03:10:48Z
- Signer
- 1HZHJ7eMz61tgxnYx6mdoVJuM9n8VwRTs7
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#4355
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1HZHJ7eMz61tgxnYx6mdoVJuM9n8VwRTs7 VerifiedReposted by (1)
Replies (5)
the reason as why that's the simplist is that it doesn't have any of the complications of losses — there's no thermodynamics in it ONCE it's a superconductor
there's thermodynamics in it to GET there, but once you have the superconductor it's an extremely simple to understand object and the relationships that you get from it are extremely simple
but ONCE you have a superconductor , you don't need maxwell's equations, you're just treating the electron as a wave — the electrons in the superconductor all lock into phase — that's why it's superconducting.
ONCE you know that, you can write down what they do simply.