That was always one of my biggest concerns about bitcoin from day 1. On the other hand, I always knew the decentralization that matters most would be the free market of many different cryptocoins to choose from.
Post by twetch#23012
That, and different coins can have different use cases and you can exchange between them so easily. You don't need one network for everything. BTC is fine as a secure digital gold. That trust in itself enables other use cases on other chains.
What the chain says
- Block
- 634 749
- Time
- 2020-05-13T14:03:26Z
- Signer
- 1HYi2QYEiVuNVFeCofr4nq2SXKwNT7q4ca
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#23012
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1HYi2QYEiVuNVFeCofr4nq2SXKwNT7q4ca VerifiedReplies (1)
Indeed. In fact each chain can host on type of info and one currency used for that information, which is sorta how I thought things would play out back in 2010 before ethereum, when namecoin was the thing.
Still makes me sad how namecoin failed.