"no 'victim' of the double spends that occurred have come forward, so it’s possible the attack sought to simply wreak havoc rather than make a profit."
Possible? Or likely? Who goes through the effort to attack a chain without seeking profit?
What the chain says
- Block
- 697 179
- Time
- 2021-07-23T16:28:24Z
- Signer
- 1EUusyvWXKXyoS6MzVFPvUfJoxWLLuS6Zw
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1EUusyvWXKXyoS6MzVFPvUfJoxWLLuS6Zw Verified