Magic is more empirical than science.
Post by twetch#4245
What is this magical empiricism you speak of?
What the chain says
- Block
- 659 987
- Time
- 2020-11-05T14:16:45Z
- Signer
- 1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#4245
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R VerifiedReplies (7)
Magic is: "When I do X, Y happens. So I do X".
Where science as it stands would begin with: "X is ridiculous and has been disproven so we can't discuss or engage in it. Let's produce a weak proxy of Y with some prescription drugs"
Science is so politicised that magic looks empirical in comparison?
That is probably right.
Yeah something like that. I also think magic and science have a single point of origin. The reason science got split off from magic was because the church/state corrupted the previously unified entity of seeking to understand and apply knowledge.
So the practitioners attempted to chunk off the corrupted parts and call them magic to pursue with less baggage.
Now that's reversed. The science part is more corrupted, so people are looking back the previously discredited magic part.
But they're same.
X = when I take IMedDo.com detox system purchased with BSV
Y = I get healthy.
So I do X. Magician Physician alternative medicine is real medicine!