Consider: Individuals are all their own means of production, and they are free to exchange their mind, body, labor, etc. for whatever they see fit. They choose for themselves what they are willing to exchange for - how much they are paid.
Post by twetch#622
In fact, the workers do own the means of production, and they freely exchange that means for other things, such as money.
What you actually don't like is that some people are able to exchange for more money than others, doing different work.
What the chain says
- Block
- 626 104
- Time
- 2020-03-13T23:16:14Z
- Signer
- 1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#622
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Eyk15KEeYX9JwH8e98pqpX3kTUuY9d43C VerifiedReplies (15)
You have repeatedly talked about entrepreneurs as "other" than "workers," yet entrepreneurial skills are work, too.
What you can't wrap your mind around is that good entrepreneurial skills are rare, so those who possess them can demand a higher price.
I have thoroughly enjoyed this thread with you because you have repeatedly undermined your own position. It's sad that you don't even know it, because you're too busy creating artificial and meaningless classifications of people.
You are inconsistent in your logic, contradicting yourself at every turn.
Further, you haven't the foggiest clue what your philosophy applied to the world would do.
Without specialization in entrepreneurship, resources are poorly allocated.
Not at all, your mindset is simply stuck in existing business structure. You keep thinking that someone who has money deserved the right to get rewards for work that was done by others just because they STARTED the business. WORK is ONGOING.
The result of poor resource allocation?
People go hungry.
Poverty is not escaped.
Literacy remains a luxury.
And governments force people not to specialize in the very skills that would change the world for the better.