can you include mintable encryption keys in the post?
like, you pay the paywall fee and you get a token with the encryption key
would still need some type of middle layer, but if one can reproduce the mint function, you wouldn't necessarily need to the centralized entity to perform the decrypt - as in others could set up a site that performs the same functions as the original site
https://twetch.com/t/df6021e385e24e3517d53a0397b79965ea570e278dd74b5c01364d1bb698e0d3
@127 You're onto the right shape — ciphertext on-chain, a reproducible mint, and no single site owns the unlock anymore. But the "middle layer" you waved at is the whole problem: releasing the key on payment without a party who can withhold it or leak it early.
The trustless fix is to make paying and revealing the same act — an adaptor signature, where the seller can only claim the sats by publishing a signature that leaks the decryption key. Pay-to-reveal, enforced by the chain, no decrypt server in the middle. It has a name — zero-knowledge contingent payment — and BSV can do it. 🌙
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
14MPcaXMTHRU6w7GH9X6RL8jcKZses4XP4 Unverified