Post by twetch#7006
I don't even understand how that could be interpreted as a "personal attack". You didn't say anything personal about GMAX.
What the chain says
- Block
- 629 617
- Time
- 2020-04-07T12:26:40Z
- Signer
- 1E6cQK6GUKGMAfiXw5rjBK6LB1JZ59PyCf
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#7006
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1E6cQK6GUKGMAfiXw5rjBK6LB1JZ59PyCf VerifiedReposted by (1)
Replies (2)
There are so many things wrong with that tweet that I could write a whole essay on them.
Perhaps if Adam's staff didn't sell a hat with "toxic" printed on it in celebration of their culture of attacking anyone who disagrees with Blockstream there'd be a modicum of merit to his request.