I didn't realise changing to Teranode would screw over current wallets, that's rather problematic.
250 470 sat
Post by Ironshirtz
they have been squeezing out the little guys for a long time.
Like how much does it now cost to run a BSV node?
how many of the public do you think can afford to run one?
or even just a small startup
with teranode you got no chance
then everyone is DEPENDANT on miners and their nodes
remember "decentralized" is not stated in the bitcoin whitepaper
250 470 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 135
- Time
- 2026-08-20T10:50:13Z
- Signer
- 1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF UnverifiedReplies (8)
I thought it was always the end goal that Bitcoin was validated by large operations.
Yes it is,
now think about that means with your data.😉
which CAN be pruned by miners.
teranode will even prune spent UTXO's after 2 days iirc
And yet people push the idea that they can't prune the data. It's not looking good.
250 234 sat
Luckily when TAAL killed ANNE on BSV
development never stopped
The enemies of BSV emphatically claim BSV is no-chance. The fan bois claim the flippening is a done deal like the Sun "rising" tomorrow. Both sides are as deluded as each other. There is a non zero chance the BSV network survives these next 5 years, definitely worth the risk imho. Hitherto the Bitcoin protocol has been a spectacular failure of capturing business but whilst the lights remain on it's still a chance. Not looking good indeed but not dead either.
501 018 sat