One entity owning 51% + hash is not a secure network by definition.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9w6du3/psa_bsv_mining_is_totally_centralized_with_one/ ??
One entity owning 51% + hash is not a secure network by definition.
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9w6du3/psa_bsv_mining_is_totally_centralized_with_one/ ??
yet it is secure so far.
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
13bnv8BQaAcLnZQ4jzPBY4Uftw9QaFzgTr VerifiedWe're at risk I know. But we also have Bitcoin Association (I play no role there) and I think it's a good entity and I'd encourage people from other networks to join in.
awesome and you know i am just bored atm
gotta hand it to them though https://greatgameindia.com/
i just hit the speed limit
we are currently a world at war correct?
who asked you @3 😋
why worry about these things?
if network grows then more hash from other places cometh
i am not particularly worried. never put all eggs in one basket
i just like to seek answers and opinions to complex things of interest as well as pose annoying questions some days.
do you play monopoly Sir? do you think BSV "will growth out of it"
🤷♂️