This back and forth debate is pointless. this is not about the crucifixtion that may or may not have happened in the past , whether it be 2000 or 20000 ago. To me it must mean the Crucifixation that must take in the future.
Post by twetch#1676
The only question remains, is which side of this occurence do you want to belong. It turns out right and left have great meaning that we can all agree about.
What the chain says
- Block
- 624 238
- Time
- 2020-02-29T22:32:42Z
- Signer
- 1KgvmaFtorEUstUA9dGMsLnkZQNWBmhPPV
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#1676
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1KgvmaFtorEUstUA9dGMsLnkZQNWBmhPPV VerifiedReplies (11)
there is nothing divine related to Christianity - other than the attempt to mimic and replace a covenant with god with a covenant of the son of a roman soldier and an adulterer. there is nothing divine about politics and jealousy
I don’t believe in replacement theology, it is against scripture. I believe Judah will be saved just as Ephraim will be. Yeshua came to bring Ephraim back to make Judah and Israel one again.
Again.... I do not believe in replacement theology, nor foes the New Testament suggest replacement theology. As far as your wiki link, the covenant was not made with the Jewish people. There was a covenant made with Avraham, and there was a covenant made
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.