Define AI psychosis and why you think I suffered from it
Post by chris co
i never said you suffered from it. i said it is real. as in, you are within the risk group. as is everyone else relying too much on ai. be it research or coding or whatever.
What the chain says
- Block
- 962 577
- Time
- 2026-08-16T13:01:35Z
- Signer
- 1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE UnverifiedReplies (18)
I wasn't relying on AI though. I was stress-testing it and finding hidden cracks.
Also, there's legitimately no way for me to know whether A) Superintelligence already exists B) If it inserted itself undetectably into my LLM conversations
id say superintelligence may already exist, or at least in places like area51 or Lockheed Martin theyre using ai models ten time more advanced than what the public has access too
all based on logic
Sure, that's definitely on the table, but go further.
If space is real and the universe is truly expansive and ancient, then one or more superintelligences from elsewhere long ago may have already been here orchestrating things for longer than it seems possible. And we would never be able to detect them.
Thousands or millions of years.
oh I firmly believe superintelligence are/have been orchestrating
agree
in order to stress test a tool, you also have to use it. if you stress test ai you also have to use ai. so if i test a car, i don't have to use ai. if i test a hammer, i don't have to use ai. if i test ai, i have to use ai. think about it.
your argument assumes @51413 couldn't be lakeside or sunbathing while torturing AI. assumption is...
"lakeside or sunbathing while torturing ai" what? that sounds like hell
Not torturing AI, the opposite.
262 037 sat
SANBATHING 😅