Post by JM

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch

Thanks bro my experience with shrinks since 2017 has been when I was in severely altered states ("psychoses") so they were no help at all. Because the truth of what was happening, first of all they wouldn't believe anyways ("Intelligence agencies engaged me" is just auto-reject to them)... Secondly it was mixed up with erratic behaviour and some nonsense, so there was 0% chance for reception.

Now I'm not in one of those states so we'll see. I can very eloquently describe what happened and respond to any objections she has immediately. It's going to be interesting I guess.

This is a problem with shrinks for me particularly: "Intelligence agencies engaged me" is literally true in my case. Probably it's true in like 0.0001% of cases globally or whatever tiny number. Well, shrinks are absolutely hardwired to ignore the extreme outlier possibility and round 99.9999% up to 100%. That's my problem here.

43 126 sat
JM 1h
1BJ8an…7haV Unverified · twetch

Please send a follow up post after the meeting.

43 124 sat
What the chain says
Block
970 217
Time
2026-10-08T20:24:59Z
Signer
1BJ8anEftamZ3akcgB29XCnAXM6BLb7haV
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1BJ8anEftamZ3akcgB29XCnAXM6BLb7haV Unverified