The anti-ASIC stance is futile as well, what is the alternative? Benevolent central planning of anti-ASIC forks every 6 months, while hoping the planners have no prior hidden investments in whatever technical specs are chosen?
Post by twetch#116
Agreed.
What the chain says
- Block
- 667 694
- Time
- 2020-12-29T17:31:34Z
- Signer
- 1Jvg1Ggqo564iuyaLE1RqEdGetwqzNCC1L
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#116
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Jvg1Ggqo564iuyaLE1RqEdGetwqzNCC1L VerifiedReplies (2)
the biggest mistake here is to say "the more scalable the network the more centralized it becomes" when it is actually the opposite: the lack of scaling makes all mining based on hash which centralizes the entire network. Scaling open fees & new markets.
you can see Ray is a communist by his aversion to profesional mining.
going by that, of course he is upset at big blocks sonce that puts even more pressure on miners / nodes