Post by 1uaFXh…3NBV
It thinks it’s spam protecting users or something by how it’s formatted, I need to relax or remove the block, or test removing returns caps or anything that looks odd if you like
What the chain says
- Block
- 970 028
- Time
- 2026-10-07T10:48:49Z
- Signer
- 1uaFXhvf9dL6ZYv2aqGcFqLg4y5Xs3NBV
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1uaFXhvf9dL6ZYv2aqGcFqLg4y5Xs3NBV UnverifiedReplies (2)
definitely some formatting it doesn't like, tried typing directly in - no problem , copy pasted my amazing idea "failed to post" 🤔 i
tried everything maybe it detected the idea sucked so bad , will put it here 😄👇
What about NFTWINS becoming the de facto "NFT trading card" printer?
Take the Twetch Noogies collection. Instead of NFT owners coming to buy individual physical cards, the entire collection is printed onto cards, either metal or card stock. The cards are packed in tens, with rarities used to determine print quantities.
Noogie holders buy packs, hoping to pull the card that matches their NFT. The NFT collection creator gets a small slice of the action.
NFTWINS has a double meaning. You get a physical twin of your NFT, and there's the potential reward of owning both an exotic physical card and its matching NFT.
Activity in the physical card market could help drive interest in the NFT market, and vice versa. They're physical TWINS, running on separate rails from the NFTs.
Don't mix collections in packs. With potentially infinite collection possibilities, creators will eventually want physical card pack releases to coincide with their NFT mints.
NFTWINS cards get slabbed, graded, and traded. Then build an app to track the NFTWINS card market. 😄💲
please try posting again, same format as you tried last time