will be interesting to see how they solve the encryption problem. i imagine it's easier if you have dedivated encrypted posts for subscribers. but for the general audience to be able to decrypt it will have to be a twetch key involved? that would mean those posts could only be seen on twetch, which would be counter to the defi narrative
Post by chris co
236 549 sat
now i remember we already had encrypted posts in old twetch, but they never put a paywall in, it was just that encrypted posts were able to be "deleted"
236 375 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 583
- Time
- 2026-08-23T15:01:18Z
- Signer
- 1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE UnverifiedReplies (5)
so even then, encrypted with...?
yeah that was with a twetch key of course
so same issue
"that would mean those posts could only be seen on twetch"
yes. which is fine with me. twitter with micropayments. but i think the original idea of "tweets etched on chain" would be lost, as whatever is etched on chain with the twetch encryption key would only be consumable through the twetch server. we would then need a twetchetch for twetches etched on chain.