not quite true. נָחָשׁ (Serpent) tricked Eve who caused Adam to eat apples not me.
and she 'Eve' gave also to her husband 'Adam' with her, and he ate.
Genesis 3:6
not quite true. נָחָשׁ (Serpent) tricked Eve who caused Adam to eat apples not me.
and she 'Eve' gave also to her husband 'Adam' with her, and he ate.
Genesis 3:6
Adam had every chance to deny Eve and request to 'Eloah' Elohim- God that he permit Eve to suffer higher remuneration (lower wages) than himself for entirety but oh no
Adam wanted it to be God-like also.
he failed to comprehend - 'covenant'
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
148sxacPXapQNhFBRnY9PPY5qcyoiacGeq Verifiedi think you all missed the relationship between irrefutable social technology and its association with biblical fact & also replacement theology. let us recap with provable association. Moses created Genesis not CSW but anyway, lets go, before Genesis
as witnessed in this link
before any such Jesus Christ appeared
sure there was @1007 & @2875 but no Christ Jesus
just Lord Man & Temptation.
we are now entering another era of replacement theology is all which began before Christ appears
thank you @729 @666 this historic connection now provides the future an insight into a genuine past relationship between God Man & Temptation
It required no Jesus or church whatsoever it really only required enough non offensive acts and communication
https://twetch.app/t/45955d483589503991748706f9244e16a0605259f5342601db02383d386789d3
i had nothing to do with irrefutable social media platforms for that you can thank @4 who came forth
lol but from that day forth, we begin to understand an irrefutable new covenant. without Jesus, the author's true point comes forth midway through the book