In this case you responded to the fruits of my labor and capital by replying to me. So you did not have a problem assigning it to "my self".
Do you have an example where you have a difficulty assigning (capital) causes and effects?
Post by twetch#15231
The problem of what encompasses the self is a problem of subjectivity and objectivity. The self that can be made an object is not the Seer which is the Self that is aware of that object. Capital relates to span and Self to depth. For instance, your dollar
What the chain says
- Block
- 633 771
- Time
- 2020-05-06T18:06:48Z
- Signer
- 1EcXZGMVxsmcY4X13PsH5hNJqafytn3EMH
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#15231
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1EcXZGMVxsmcY4X13PsH5hNJqafytn3EMH VerifiedReplies (3)
Capital is the word used to describe what you are the "head" of. Dollars, real estate are examples of capital. So is one's body.
I understand your definition of capital and I really like it. I like the concept of seeing one's material essence as capital instead of simply wealth, etc. But the claim still assumes that "Self" is a quantifiable order of material being, which it is not.
All Being is material. There is no Being without material.
Information/thoughts are inseperable from energy/matter. By definition.