Post by twetch#3375

1CndCz…Ymfg Key · twetch

3/5
cooperators be able to afford more?

I have no problem with attempts to layer profits on services. I feel it's becoming somewhat off track focusing so hard on the signalling effect of transactions.

Instead we can focus on the plethora of opportunities

1Abd9y…ujrm Key · twetch

Read "Biological Signals as Handicaps" Grafen 1990.

What the chain says
Block
630 349
Time
2020-04-12T21:20:48Z
Signer
1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#3375

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1Abd9yJS6mrzMmj1Ni6kjQB9GqtyaNujrm Verified

Replies (2)

1CndCz…Ymfg Key · twetch
Replying to@1Abd9y…ujrm

1/2
Thank you, for those interested in an excellent review and critique:
The Handicap Principle: how an erroneous hypothesis became a scientific principle Penn 2019
https://bit.ly/2y6k52y
IMO, as far as actionable lessons, almost all that can be salvaged

1CndCz…Ymfg Key · twetch
Replying to@1CndCz…Ymfg

2/2
is Spence's https://bit.ly/3b62syr

assumption, viz. 'cost of signal MUST be lower for high value info and act as signal to receiver such that they will pay a higher cost'

High cost != honest, must consider individual case cost/benefit of deception