Alright, you can argue that, but I can argue that when I use logic & reason I think it will work (by understanding working principles)
Actually, just remembered, this type of production has been done already and it did work, so no belief is actually needed
Post by twetch#1838
Also must understand that this type of belief is not same as blind faith that religions are based on.
Scientist starts with thinking, develops a theory, starts believing theory will work, tests it to see if it does. If yes or no, its no longer belief.
What the chain says
- Block
- 626 150
- Time
- 2020-03-14T08:16:48Z
- Signer
- 165ggu6voGX2oMvi4U6xTdSAGtd8aHgEQT
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#1838
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
165ggu6voGX2oMvi4U6xTdSAGtd8aHgEQT VerifiedReplies (5)
Scientists start with preconceived ideas, develop a theory; test it. The theory may work, until new observations contradict the theory. Their beliefs now cause them to deny the observations, or perform contortions with the theory to force it to the facts.
Well if theory is validated with experiment its no longer theory but fact
Some science is indeed just theoretical & hasn't been proven
Yes, theories do change based on new thinking, observation
I don't ignore option of deep state faking some evidence also
Isaac Newton performed experiments on light and showed it to be made of particles. Thomas Young's light experiment showed that light is a wave. Now quantum theory tell us it's both. Which of these is a fact?
You are wrong though that scientists force their belief regardless of observations, all good scientists always base thinking based on observations, its actually religion does things other way around, like Flat Earth theory proved wrong through observations
Many a scientist has been forced out of their profession or to remain silent because of groupthink. Observations refuting current paradigm are routinely ignored or denied.