Post by twetch#1933

1L4RWa…w5kd Key · twetch

Doesn’t sound super competitive fee wise

What the chain says
Block
661 213
Time
2020-11-14T09:55:45Z
Signer
1L4RWaXx93KZoe1sbLpN4YMhD7PXhVw5kd
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#1933

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1L4RWaXx93KZoe1sbLpN4YMhD7PXhVw5kd Verified

Replies (7)

17DJKz…CNQ2 Key · twetch
Replying to@17DJKz…CNQ2

It's ~5KB only in that case. I picked 20 inputs and outputs as a good "standard" so that the base contract is ~10KB (not bad trade-off for 20x more inputs/outputs).

1L4RWa…w5kd Key · twetch
Replying to@17DJKz…CNQ2

For the reference: erc20 transfer is about $0.5, eth transfer is about $0.2. I like 20 inputs for erc20 :D

17DJKz…CNQ2 Key · twetch
Replying to@1L4RWa…w5kd

Doing a 20-way merge at current fee rate, for when BSV is worth $2,000 still costs about as much as any Ethereum transfer.

This is the world's cheapest permissionless FT token solution already.

So far to go still...

Continue thread →
17DJKz…CNQ2 Key · twetch
Replying to@1L4RWa…w5kd

Great point! I just ran the numbers now.

Assuming BSV is worth 10x today ($2,000 USD) then the fee is about 5-10 cents per transfer at the current fee rate (0.1 sat/byte). That fee rate will go down 10-20x over next 12-24 months.