Evan Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.
1NTYDhbss11ExXNwnwLo9n7DwmAPVbXQSa
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 88 Posts
Activity
Puns are good.
Hope to see you all Hoon!
4.886.090.225.015.912.526.281.362.576.074.522.510.354.387.028.263.404.290.185.890.181.426
Nock Nock, Hoon’s there?
https://youtu.be/xvWBd4s_6zE
Ah crap. Sorry to hear that. Hope it's not too bad!
Sounds like I am this time. :(
Glad to hear it! Let me know if I can do anything for you from my end. Apologies for my physical limitations. :P
Very interested in this. I look forward to seeing the progress. Don’t hesitate on any posts!
twetch#9515 6.6y
🐝Tomorrow I begin my beekeeping journey. Will drop random pics and interesting knowledge I acquire along the way.🐝
🙏🏻🙇♂️
Hatred stirreth up strifes: but love covereth all sins.
Sorry for letting fear win sometimes.
So language is deep in nature.
is that this word language is used by us to mean spoken language and it also means the general class of linguistic activity as in computer language, body language, so forth and so on.
twetch#2868 6.6y
And to think clearly about language we need to have a clear distinction between spoken language and the general syntactical organisation of reality. Language, because that is old, honeybees do it, dolphins, termites, octopi they all do it different ways,
https://twetch.app/t/437a1efc98ba706b45feea7d6687f0a0d69dded81d7a07ecddbea9295400bef5
there is much of language in nature. In fact you could argue that all of nature is a linguistic enterprise because the DNA essentialy is a symbolic system. Those codons which code for protein are arbitrarily assigned, assigned in other words by
twetch#2868 6.6y
convention, there is no chemical relationship between the codons and the proteins they code for - anymore than there is a relationship between an english word and the thing it intends, those are just conventionalised by probability over time.
https://twetch.app/t/fe2e2910a9bdeb06e0bd6bc208544d70308c38db5e7a9b73a58f9c50500ca148
And to think clearly about language we need to have a clear distinction between spoken language and the general syntactical organisation of reality. Language, because that is old, honeybees do it, dolphins, termites, octopi they all do it different ways,
https://twetch.app/t/437a1efc98ba706b45feea7d6687f0a0d69dded81d7a07ecddbea9295400bef5
twetch#2868 6.6y
there is much of language in nature. In fact you could argue that all of nature is a linguistic enterprise because the DNA essentialy is a symbolic system. Those codons which code for protein are arbitrarily assigned, assigned in other words by
convention, there is no chemical relationship between the codons and the proteins they code for - anymore than there is a relationship between an english word and the thing it intends, those are just conventionalised by probability over time.
https://twetch.app/t/fe2e2910a9bdeb06e0bd6bc208544d70308c38db5e7a9b73a58f9c50500ca148
twetch#2868 6.6y
So language is deep in nature.
Part of what makes it difficult for us to think about language clearly in english,
twetch#2868 6.6y
is that this word language is used by us to mean spoken language and it also means the general class of linguistic activity as in computer language, body language, so forth and so on.
Yeah I see what you’re saying. They will do a similar thing with these at some point I bet. Just a matter for figuring out what works best.
twetch#2761 6.6y
Hmm I don't like it.. text branches look inferior
https://twetch.app/t/872c4ad2224b367fd5e0eb07330632873de4aabe410f7f16784c3ca8d2cbaa37
Reposted
twetch#3898 6.6y
Now, when I think about it, I'm sure that I must have lived a life appropriate to a caterpillar. Long ago, Chuang Tzu fluttered about as a butterfly in a dream. In the dream he had taken on the mind of a butterfly and had no idea that he was a man;
Yes! Branch 2.0 is excellent!