bwmilby Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

That isn’t proof. I really don’t trust the data from China and everything else is pretty much speculation. PCR detects dead virus too and we crank up the cycles too much. I should have said no proof of widespread asymptotic transmission.

I don’t understand your logic. Poor and young applies to all races. There are poor white folk and the ID requirement would apply to all. Are you saying that poor non-white can’t get an ID but the poor white can?

Also with that logic, if you have tested positive for COVID then you would not need to wear a mask since you can no longer be a carrier. (After you recover obviously)

I don’t buy it. No proof of asymptotic transmission. Pre-symptomatic possibly, but masks are probably doing as much to harm as to help. And mandates are totally ineffective. Just look at comparisons between states that do and do not require them.

The question was about the requirement being racist which I don’t think it is. “Poor and younger” is not racial. I can’t say that I’ve seen any headline condemning voter ID based on cost, it is mostly based on it being racist which is disingenuous.

However, if the polling station was doing a signature verification, that is better than nothing. I think there is still more opportunity for fraud there.

I don’t understand that concern. There are other services that poor people obtain that require an ID. The point of ID is to validate the person coming to the poll is who they claim to be.

Things are not uniform. My polling stations (2 different states) did not perform signature verification. They used my ID. I think using a photo ID to establish identity is better than having someone match signatures.

I guess my point wasn’t so much about a label as a framework that informed your current belief system. It seems more eastern influenced than western, but I realize that is a gross generalization. I strongly agree that we need to show more love.

What religious tradition would you say most closely aligns to your beliefs? I’m asking as it may help guide responses. As someone who believes in the authenticity and inspiration of the Bible, my world view is based on those beliefs for example. @111

Those are some really sharp looking coins!

Curious about step 4. I know that you need to move it to use it, but are there other considerations I’m missing?

Yes, this thread definitely has included stuff from the other that was dealing with the case more directly.

Isn’t that how the alert worked? Crypto proof was that the message was signed by the proper key. Same type of thing could potentially be implemented to satisfy court order.

Prove in court. In order for it to matter, it would need to be in a jurisdiction where a significant miner population would be impacted (directly or due to international law agreements). I’m not sure that a UK case would qualify.

What happens if CSW can prove who he purchased those coins from? Then we are looking at the situation where CSW paid for something that is clearly linked to what was stolen from someone else. I guess the one he bought them from would be liable.

A drive of some sort was stolen that contained the private keys in an encrypted container of some sort. The thief deleted the backup. The thief did not get the password. Not defending the accuracy of the story, just using it as the basis for discussion.

I’m still having difficulty in seeing how this applies to one specific piece of the CSW lawsuit. The coins are known, the issue is that the key was stolen and the thief is unknown. What other property rights are encumbered there?

Does this apply to asset recovery when the coins have not moved? Does this apply when you can prove that coins were moved to the thief’s wallet (and are still there)? I can see difficulty if coins were moved to unknown entities.

Break implies a fault happened. If a court orders reassignment, then it isn’t broken, the ledger was amended per court order. I think that if a court issues an order and any chain refuses then that chain will end up dealing with consequences.

Thus cementing their relationship with those who violate the law. Does not seem like a winning proposition.

What would be the incentive for BSV to implement the court order ahead of any other chain? I would think all changes would wait until it is settled legally. BTC/BCH would have to challenge the order in court.

@5798 what did I miss?

Roger. I tend to look for the good/reasonable explanation for things. I’m new to BSV this year thanks to Twetch, so still catching up.

How does the theft play into all of this? (Timeline, tokens)

I have no issue with a free voter ID card, but the truth is that most should have a paid ID. Can’t fly without a RealID soon for example. Problem is that free IDs are still called suppression since you have to get documents together and go get it.

100,000,000 X222X sent you way!

milby@moneybutton.com