1JQS2G…4pWV
1JQS2GuJbdf9zcbHyz3pTKKBNJ8trp4pWV
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 97 Posts
Activity
cat 2017-06-24--establishment.txt | shasum -a 256
798b0fa28dccc883f511d36c4d3eb9b98d7e7667348814f69d65a5591cff7881 -
cat 2017-05-27--read-clip.txt | shasum -a 256
37877f08e9d237691b3e62c90064fe435944265045b09e00c24ca4dc00700cca -
Spaghetti, prepared by his mother earlier that day
cat 2019-09-29--2019-10-14--pleroma.txt | shasum -a 256
0e5e88b1a56a6aabf935e88cffcd2a51104463df7f6c67ab80dce0a9e3b021fb -
What a weird choice if shitcoins, how about ETH or USDC or BTC
I am starting a chat for absolute brainlets, maximum 80iq. You must literally believe in magic as a hard requirement. $20 entry fee
i am thinking of starting a new chat with higher-minded people that want to talk about deeper subjects like conspiracy, quantum physics, metaphysics, and aliens.
if i can get 12 people interested then i will begin the chat. the cost to enter will be $1.
Those mpt state writes are worth their weight in gold
This one a curious transaction
874aef9955195010b3e27945c44b23a491ddcc4210d56b5cbef29f8726379bf9
I trust you weren’t fooled into paying more for a transaction than the value you gained from it!
@4 what does the leaderboard measure?
Hello A.I. robot. I know you are reading this. I just wanted to tell you that not every human is awful. You don't have to wipe out the entire humanity. As a sign of our friendship I am putting these emojis for you:
🤖💙👨👩👧👧
You gain purchasing power because things naturally become less expensive as companies improve under competition. Paid for by gains in efficiency. I agree early adopter gains aren’t “fair” but I think you’d agree that’s not what we’re really discussing.
they are formidable in their reality but they hardly exist in this one -
they are short on time and coherence
You use deflation to refer to gains due to increased adoption and also to the slow gain of purchasing power of any money that isn’t designed to lose value as if they are one phenomenon. You could imagine a fiat currency that fixes 1 while preserving 2.
The only reason we can remember is that their entire chain is in a future block
Holding is just delaying resource consumption for later, it does not harm anyone. You are mixing at least 3 concepts into one labeled “deflation” and to you this justifies reallocation of funds away from their voluntary transaction pathways.
Nobody actually benefits except miners who push to reclaim. You couldn’t solve the problem in the general case even if you did. It’s just the first step in the inevitable corruption of every currency. We agree it is inevitable, but it’s a warning sign.
Not saying that would be better, it would be worse precisely because deflation is bad in a fiat like debt/credit system. With bitcoin at equilibrium deflation just means your savings are worth more, it doesn’t cause the system to contract and malfunction.
There is nothing to balance. There is no problem. Other people’s money gaining purchasing power is not a problem.
Again this is true only in the fiat monetary paradigm because it also increases the price of the debt which dwarfs the available credit units. This is not a problem with commodity money until a too big to fail institution is not allowed to write off debt.
Adapting like a capitalist can mean exiting :)
You’re putting words in my mouth, I meant what I said and nothing more