1Hc7k8iR1SsAP62wCCKZ6U4MEYXvb5ohoh
Without adding fund NoteSV connect to:
Hetzner Online AG (always)
GitHub, Inc. = Microsoft Corporation (always + 2nd update)
Amazon.com, Inc. (always)
Google LLC
Cloudflare, Inc.
I expect no connections till manual update, post or sync, then disconnect.
NoteSV test
https://note.sv/
Connect to:
static.163.148.9.176.clients.your-server.de
lb-140-82-121-4-fra.github.com
cdn-185-199-108-154.github.com
ec2-18-179-239-80.ap-northeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com
fra16s49-in-f8.1e100.net
142.250.185.104
104.16.19.94
I heard some rumors about an earlier relationship and extortion between Craig Wright and Michele Seven (Bitcoin Belle):
https://www.instagram.com/cryptonautica/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_Ho6GJ_hoBLPRImybvgdtQ
Is there some truth in that story?
Tiffany Hayden did some research about the hosting past from bitcoin.org, bitcoin.net, craigwright.net and other related domains:
https://twitter.com/haydentiff/status/1364779526010658817/
https://twitter.com/haydentiff/status/1365451563083399176/
She probably used the paid service https://whois.domaintools.com/
Yes, and that's not the only thing as soon every transaction has some data that must also be processed. It cost already 70 seconds or more to send a one 8.5GB block over a 1Gbit line.
Yes, they negotiate that with miners?
For now it's probably more interesting for Tesla to store only hashes once an hour or a day in BSV as proof of stored data in own data centers. 30 years ago 1-2GB HD price was the same as 14TB HD today and the 1 Mbit bandwidth price went from $10k to $2.5.
For $233mln transaction costs a year Tesla can build their own data center. 15k miners is to high, 60-120 miners 10-20 at each continent is enough. In that case 0.25 sat/byte can be lowered a factor 100 to 0.0025 sat/byte down to $2.33mln a year for Tesla.
That are 467,784,000,000 Tesla car transactions a year. If the costs are 0.25 sat/byte is 1,197,527 BSV x $195 = $233,517,773 a year.
Then there is space for 15k miners each investing $15k storage hardware, energy, rack space, bandwidth and admin a year.
If every Tesla car data transaction is 1024 bytes in size, every 10min block with 8.9mln car transactions is 8691MB in size, that's almost 50.9GB an hour, that's a little over 1.19TB a day, that's over 435TB a year. RAID5 storage 32 x 14TB x $300 = $9600.
Top 25 apps last 30 days:
One week ago I saw:
Type: d://
OP_RETURN: 19iG3WTYSsbyos3uJ733yK4zEioi1FesNU
data
SOON 02 24 2021
Now more data no soon.
Has anybody an idea what this is?
What if Elon Musk want to stream Tesla car data via 5G or Starlink direct to the BSV blockchain = timestamp, immutable = no disagreement about originality data.
But BSV STN 14775 tx/s max limit is reached when 8.9mln cars send one transaction every 10min.
I posted today some links to archived C01N top 500 listings but they are later delisted, don't know why.
Two links posted 1/23/21 by TwetchDat about C01N with NVIDIA GPU's top 500 list specs, Linpack TFlop/s score and The Register article:
https://top500.org/system/178514/
https://www.theregister.com/2015/09/23/nine_of_the_worlds_fastest_gpu_supercomputers/
https://twetch.app/t/40bc35d5f117e6dd8edf9f2e39514e2a775a7b8077fb6ce0f66a95d82a1e040e
Top 500 list November 2014, C01N delist:
No. 64 Tulip Trading Australia
C01N - SuperBlade SBI-7127RG-E, Intel Xeon E5-2695v2 12C 2.4GHz
First C01N listing archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/20141119165151/https://www.top500.org/list/2014/11/
Top 500 list June 2015, C01N delist:
No. 15 Tulip Trading Australia
C01N - SGI ICE X/SuperBlade SBI-7127RG-E, Intel Xeon E5-2695v2 12C 2.4GHz
First C01N listing archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150714040552/https://www.top500.org/list/2015/06/
Last C01N listing archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/20171003122935/https://www.top500.org/list/2014/11/
C01N removed all shifted one up:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180103011351/https://www.top500.org/list/2014/11/
Last C01N listing archived:
https://web.archive.org/web/20171003064435/https://www.top500.org/list/2015/06/
C01N removed all shifted one up:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180130013914/https://www.top500.org/list/2015/06/
Why two Tulip Trading C01N super computers are delisted from the November 2014 and June 2015 Top 500 list?
