1Fr13p…EYPN

Truth, I know some of them: epidemiologists, researchers, professors... they're good well meaning people who are working extremely hard to help the spread of this virus

Absolutely agree with you. Do I think shady things are happening with the vaccine rollout? Yes. Does that discount the quality research and efficacy of vaccines in general? No. There's a middle ground here. We need vaccines

High entropy information. The bigger the surprise to find out about it, the more valuable it is: information theory. This sums up BSV (i.e. BitCoin) in a nutshell

"The Austrian theory of money implies that the value of money is the other people."

This solves a lot of problems. UBI included, i.e. UEI (Universal Earned Income).

https://coingeek.com/daniel-krawisz-bitcoin-and-speculation/

#BitCoin $BSV $BTC $ETH XRP

What's the maximum # of hops a TX will make on the BitCoin network -- expressed in big O notation (I'll take short-hand or explicit). First correct answer gets USD$1 #BitCoin #BSV $BSV #BTC $BTC #ETH $ETH #ADA $ADA #XRP $XRP

https://twetch.app/t/e8f6b4a073170f379ebdfb8eada3c7452caec7e80de53b0dbb8c01481464d6a8

Yes and No. Belligerent a-holes can be silenced; however, they won't lose their content history or followers -- both of which could be theoretically transferred to another app interface, e.g. PowPing.com because the data is on-chain. How it should be done

Listen to Political Order and Political Decay by Francis Fukuyama on Audible. https://www.audible.ca/pd/B072LKCL85?source_code=ASSOR150021921000R

You pay only for what you use, and they supply only what you need. So much more efficient. Cheaper for the user (and less invasive) and more profitable for the company. Win-win. Plus, the data analytics potential is waaaaay bigger than current ad shit

And Twetch is a great example of this tech in action. It's still early days but look at what's been accomplished. The implications are huge. Micropayments solve so many problems from clientelism in struggling countries to cheaper Netflix: world changing

Twetch makes money the way Google and Facebook have been trying to make money since the early 2000s before they gave in and went ad model: micropayments. Twetch takes a small cut of each TX. It's beautiful. Like just-in-time supply chain at light speed

No one in the "crypto" world seems to understand that Bitcoin (now BSV) solved 2 previously insurmountable technical, economic, and legal issues: double-spending and Byzantine Generals. It's the only solutions in existence that's achieved this...

If you're not using on-chain TXs (or at least anchoring P2P with settling on-chain) you haven't solved shit because this is the only way to do it without a trusted 3rd party, i.e. do it efficiently, at scale. In essence, everything other than BSV is a joke

BitCoin is the new information infrastructure and Twetch is one of the first useable examples of the micropayment business models unlocked as part of this new infrastructure

Just felt the shift. I think it's finally happening. 11 years in the making. Amazing. BSV is about to go off. #BitCoin #BSV $BSV #BTC $BTC #ETH $ETH #XRP $XRP #ADA $ADA

Do it. #BitCoin #BSV $BSV #BTC $BTC #ETH $ETH #XRP $XRP #ADA $ADA

This is currently the best course/packaged info you will find anywhere on Bitcoin and Blockchain. If you haven't done this course yet, do yourself an enormously huge favour, and do it.

https://bitcoinsv.academy/course/introduction-to-bitcoin-theory

Twetch would never work on Cardano. BitCoin is the only solution to the double-spending and byzantine generals problem we have that doesn't require a trusted 3rd part (e.g. like Cardano). Anything other than original BitCoin forgets why BitCoin to start

Absolutely, soap has had a profound effect on health: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK144018/

You'll notice they either all examine a single vaccine or they look at a single data analysis vector.

Here's a comprehensive list of vaccine research from the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/research/publications/index.html

Again, you're attacking me personally. I'm pointing out factual discrepancies with the paper you posted. There are basic scientific practices. A list of credible research from the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/research/publications/index.html

I don't care about being right. I'm looking at evidence presented. And the torrential mountain of evidence and literature all says vaccines are medically safe, effective, and are single-handedly responsible for extending the life-span of our species 30+

So not only did they not account for the huge variance between vaccines by choosing "vaccinated children", they also cherry picked their data from 1 year... sorry, but this study was awfully done.

The mere fact that they are using the terms "vaccinated children" and "unvaccinated children" shows the utter lack of medical/scientific knowledge these authors have. And again, no credible study would EVER choose more than 1 vaccine at a time to examine.

I'm not sure what you mean by wholistic?

Then, they say this in the intro which is factually incorrect. All credible studies look at "outcomes" whether positive or negative, it's bad scientific practice to look for "positive effects". Again, this discredits the entire study.

This makes no sense and it's also grammatically incorrect. Any study worth looking at would never willy nilly choose a bunch of vaccines to test; they would choose 1. Instantly discredits the entire study.

Lol. what? Yes. This is obvious? And those unvaccinated kids aren't dying because the majority of kids in most countries around the world today are vaccinated... why would unvaccinated kids be any less healthy? That's not how vaccines work...

Every interaction ON-CHAIN; none of this fake-ass second layer non-scalable Ethereum/Lightning Network bullshit. Welcome to the future