The Bitcoin Economist Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

I don't know who needs to hear this, but Law represents the interests of the ruling class. It is by no means inherently good or authoritative.

If devs introduce code that allows this, how are we not introducing a new vector for 51% attack? Simply control most of the hash power and you don't have to re-org .. just reallocate. So much easier.

The only way I can see of effectively reallocating funds, without utterly corrupting the blockchain, is blacklisting coins and creating new coins equal to the amount blacklisted. Something like this would be widely rejected.

If funds can be reallocated without the private keys, then Bitcoin is fundamentally nonsense. If we're talking about making people liable for stolen funds, that's different. Why threaten to sue devs, if the former is not your intent?

Can someone explain how reallocating funds does not corrupt the blockchain AKA destroy Bitcoin forever? Supposing CSW wins his latest legal war, what are devs going to do to Bitcoin to make it happen? And how is this not adding a back door to Bitcoin?

What we're seeing is a new trend of Empirical Economics. Most people don't understand crypto, but they know it is making money (Storing Value). So they invest accordingly.

Utility wins. Commercial utility creates a high volume of transactions. A high volume of transactions creates stability by making large transactions statistically insignificant. Stability attracts stop-loss buys. Buys are an upward pressure for price.

If I was Sony, I would have sold non-fungible tokens instead of being losers and letting scalpers buy all their inventory thereby losing sales in games, merchandise and everything else associated with actually owning a PS5.

A high volume of commercial transactions literally stabilizes price because transaction volume can be so high as to make speculative trading statistically insignificant.

Onboarding to Bitcoin will be basically be people buying tokens (for anything) and seamlessly trading them for Bitcoin. Yes. I saw this coming. Tokens will be the primary gateway to Bitcoin.

I see it now .. a universal token wallet that supports a USD token. Businesses take payments and they also issue tokens specific to their business. Cash App could never compete with this.

The race is now on for a super user friendly universal token wallet that supports a USD token. This is a CashApp killer and generally a killer app. Sell tickets, raffle tickets, store tokens, reservations, discount coupons, and much much more!

Are you struggling to find ideas? Don't. BSVers can legally implement anything that Ethereum, or any other "crypto", has ever done that is interesting. As long as it is an original implementation there are no legal issues.

There is nothing wrong or illegal about looking at other peoples' ideas and making a better implementation. In fact, that's the primary way that patents are made worthless.

Will BSV ever be the best store of value? Yes, but only by being the ultimate "Jack of all trades". Everything on Coinmarketcap has to become like the shitcoin tokens being traded on Twetch. BSV must make everything else become obsolete.

Institutional dumb money has come. Don't be silly and not milk that cash cow. I know it's dirty, but we all have to live. Right? Might as well take that money and get more BSV!

It seems like people tie their own hands because they see something has already been done or somebody already has the idea. But that's no excuse. It's always possible to make a much better implementation. Ideas are cheap.

Anything being done in "crypto" is free to be implemented on BSV. There's nothing illegal about it. Patents are limited to specific implementations. If they're too general, they do not hold up in court. DYOR. Go ahead. Recreate the wheel.

Here's the big picture. Institutional money will throw their money at whatever is mathematically the best store of value. Doesn't matter if it's pig's feet. End of story.

So that's why the market seems so irrational. They don't care WHY something stores value, only that it does. When BTC stops being a good dog, they'll transfer their capital to the best performing asset.

I know I know you look at BTC and think it's doing great, but it's really not. Remember that if its only use is Store of Value. There are things that have been kicking its ass all year long. Sadly, not BSV.

I like to look at long term charts. This year is clearly a recession for "crypto".

I didn't tell you..but now that I have been fasting for a while my health has improved. Happy about that. If you ever feel sick, I definitely recommend fasting. Somehow it restores things in your body.

I've implemented a long fast into my day. Now I'm hungry all the time. Hunger is a good thing.

For a while, BSV is going to need to just be boring plumbing to make all the hype real. Then when BSV stabilizes because of massive transactions, only then does she rise and take the lead.

Where's the for sale section? I know some of you probably need to sell some stuff to eat.

I think most of the shitcoins going to go away soon. They think it's alt season but that's not what the charts tell me.

Auction widget for Twetch?

Common people make it interesting. Make your tokens redeemable for something.