1DdstA…te31

This implies a futurity of spirit that adheres to a binary (a priori?) inclination of one’s mind towards deconstruction or optimization, without any room for nuance between the two. Affirmation of reality depends solely on this inclination.

“What have I to do with refutations!”

Nothing. If I can’t build/reveal a new path I will not distract myself with deconstructive musings.

Derrida is the manifestation (root source?, catalyst?) of the ills of modernity. Destructive spirit as heuristic

From the present state of affairs it seems reasonable to conclude that the Joycean “yes” as the archetypal feminine is incomplete - the conception of the Overman captures better the a priori nature of a directionality of spirit (I.e. a + or - charge)

The fact that there isn’t a single concise word for “music in a room”, “music in headphones”, and “music in a car” is enough to assert that linguistics < articulation of reality < perception of reality < physical reality(Newtonian) < metaphysical reality

Fear implies inaction during the call to arms Hope implies inaction in the face of the pragmatic unknown or the risk of sacrifice (time/energy) Inspiration implies action/praxis. Hope with the implicit expectation of productivity

“fear and hope” are a common example of metaphysical polarities but “fear and inspiration“ are a much better descriptor of what is truly occurring. The ability to face future potentialities with optimism vs pessimism is the grand achievement

Nietzsche’s Overman concept pertains to directionality of spirit rather than a rationalistic framework for determining a logical valuation of reality unenyconced by religiousity or dogmatism

Nietzsche is the anti-cuck

Creating something unimpressive now is unimpressive. Creative something impressive now is impressive. Creating something unimpressive now that will be immensely impressive in the future is the most impressive.

This isn’t complicated now follow your intuition and it’s quite obvious

Welcome to Twetch! Twitter is Betamax

The Christian reversal of Roman values is an example Nietzsche digs into pretty deeply. Subversion of strength, power, etc. as a noble morality in favour of weakness, sickness, poverty etc. The slave is incentivized to create a morality that elevates them

@24 I’ve noticed you make a couple references to Nietzsche recently I would love to see you do some videos digging into his philosophy 🙏

Not sure what aspect he was referring to but it’s a morality born out of inferiority. It seeks to reverse the power dynamic that oppresses the slave by valuing weakness and non-productivity as positive attributes in contrast to the “evil” of power/success

🎞 before midnight

Narrative extends over 18 years

The visuals in this film 🔥

Star Wars is midwit trash and George Lucas knew it before anyone else

No, Siena, about 45mins from Florence. They are historically rivals but very different vibes. Siena was one of the first cities in Italy where the “public square” was the centrepiece of the city architecture. A city governed by its people

My ego’s ambition is to have at least two or three potential birth dates listed in my bio

Angkor Wat is on my bucket list, looks incredible

Toronto

Saw this piece at the Met, not sure if it’s still there

Jean-Léon Gérôme for anyone interested.

Love this piece