1DEFTF…Hgm3

@ob1ock No, jobs and workers are pool software functions, not mining functions. It requires AuxPoW merge mining functions to broadcast across a hybrid node system that breaks neither chain's reference node implementation validation systems. My own IP.

@cryptol82603035 Because PoW mining is a competitive adversarial system, not a Socialist collaboration of disparate individuals with retail ADSL, contributing to governance bottlenecks trying to overcome hegemony. Nothing beats a dedicated facility.

2/2 @AscensionHelp ...so hashing is only a small subset of mining. Connectivity and distribution is just as important. Being an ISP really helps. Redirecting my hash to a pool is like putting a V8 engine on a scooter. I already launched a pool in 2017.

@AscensionHelp No, it doesn't work like that. I've reinvested €45-€60 million per year in infrastructure since 2007. This includes backbone datapipes across continents, telcoms, landing stations, nationwide switching, wind farm installation & substations.

Cross-chain sawtoothing is algorithmically determined in real-time That's the beauty of merge mining, you can mine 2 or more SHA-256d chains simultaneously with the same PoW for any given difficulty target. Best kept secret ever! 😉

Broadcast an 8 bit nonce freely upon the carrier wave and feed it into your 32 bit system to create 32 octets of memory address allocation, thus 256 bits of harmonic information. ECDSA as an efficient compression technique.

🙏

Example for context...
Below, the Twetch preview before posting was in the correct order (this selected by Twitter image select/upload sequence order). The post is the reverse of the post preview, so posts like don't make sense because time order is wrong.

Hey @852,
Small bugfix to report. When you upload images in a set sequence in Twetch, the upload reference sequence needs reversing so the image ordering is correct in Twitter.

How it started vs How it's going.
Well done Gorilla Pool. 🍌🦍

Welcome to Twetch @59337! 😀👍

I'm ambivalent about it. On one hand, it solves a small subset of an ID problem. Why does an open protocol need a token release? It could be encoded as a simple contractual function using existing AIP & BAP protocols on BSV.

On the other hand, it's interesting to see how other people approach the same problems. At least they are creating something and building. Just because it doesn't tick my boxes, doesn't mean there isn't a valid market for it. I wish them luck.

😀 🤝

My fee for giving @MineLikeAnApe 12 years worth of secret, invaluable mining knowledge to outcompete TAAL is $5 million. That investment will 20x inside 48 months. Make it rain 🍌🍌🍌.

Some of us have to learn the hard way. Hopefully, our children will have the tools to cope better than we did.

@djsuperflow If you had truly let go of your complexes, you wouldn't be a low energy anon posting in an NPC echo chamber. Try harder to be a real person and own your mistakes and misgivings.

Actually @djsuperflow my hash is uniquely distributed across 4 chains via MMA for reasons that even the most ardent BSVer fails to comprehend. Your cognitive dissonance just proves you also fail to understand how I continue to beat the system, unanswered.

Actually @djsuoeflow, my hash is uniquely distributed across 4 chains via MMA for reasons that even the most ardent BSVer fails to comprehend. Your cognitive dissonance just proves you also fail to understand how I continue to beat the system, unanswered.

Feeling much better Newt!
Sorry, just gave you a new nickname.
There are worse...

I am feeling great, thank you. Enlightened, alert, empowered, ready.

No problem, I've deleted more draft posts than I publish. Oftentimes, I have to sleep on it. 😉

There are many things that I don't understand. The greatest gift I learned from being an autist is to trust myself when it comes to the things I excel at. I obsess for a reason. My greatest weakness was doubting my abilities when others didn't understand.

So, bitcoin(dot)org is back online...

Meh!

RUN contracts are inefficient by a factor of 40. This is massive in a microtransaction economy. They don't yet understand that they are economically irrelevant because they are too busy toasting their success. Luckily, at least 4 others will replace them.

Andreas @LoveBitcoinSV there is a risk vs reward function my friend, that is miner specific. Silly JS emulated scripts are 40x bloatware for zero reason. Fee/byte tokenomics means the best economic incentive wins. Run contracts are extremely inefficient.

That is the wrong question. The correct question is "How much of discounted fee can I get from each miner for my valued data?".

RXC wouldn't survive 5 minutes in my world.

Satoshi didn't care if I didn't win, if I failed or if I misunderstood or sucked at something. He cared that I competed and raised the bar, regardless. Please, bet against my work ethic. The odds are not in your favor, in multiple disciplines.