biktso Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

/trolltoll set @37 $3

where is meltem I have questions about what happens if they all mine less bitcoins but greyscale keeps buying the same amount of bitcoins

Wow Randy

/trolltoll set @729 $9

Sken is a pretty abhorrent character. What got you into low level drama like this?

Mannequins on the field when the opposition has thermal imaging...

Is it really meant to fool the opponent? Or is it a means to fool the lesser ranks...?

Instead of solving the fundamental issue people have taken to redefining terms to fog the battlefield.

The easiest way to obtain many 'nodes' which contribute to 'decentralization' is to change the meanings of the terms 'node' and 'decentralization'.

changing the work function seems out of the question given that the Juntas political power was leveraged on the project as it exists, and it is a delicate game to keep this power, leading to find ways to upgrade that do not put the power structure at risk;

https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Axiom-of-Resistance

For BTC, The means by which to fulfill Voskuil's Axiom rests upon shaky ground.

Advocates of the new BTC network structure engage in deliberate avoidance in quantifying of what is necessary to fulfill such an axiom.

...leading to redefining the fundamentals of the network in hopes to carry it forward under their reign.

'consensus'

In the redefining the purpose of a node from a mining entity to a passive network observer; (a node being the granular component which offers up a measure of censorship resistance) the axiom falters.

The targets remain the same for the attacker; nodes which are relevant.

After conflating what a node is; these people then conflate what decentralization does.

Attempts at conflating nodes which can in fact contribute to censorship resistance (via timestamping and distributing blocks of transactions in various jurisdictions of the world) with ones that cannot is akin to a military deception attempt.

Yeah, That is luke-jr with a satellite for a halo w/ a stained glass filter.

whats that, a tomato?

youre a dork

I reckon this could even lead to storing value one day.

twetch.bandcamp.com

bandcamp.twetch.com

we must temper our selfish individual desires to transact and find a means to batch to lessen our damage on the mempoolsphere

NOT generating coins doesn't support the network in any meaningful way, as a standard node.

In order to support the network as a node; blocks must be emitted from the node.

... is akin to refusing the nature of bitcoin as a system which works on the basis of one cpu one vote in favor of a system which works on one IP address one vote.

By their own measure; nodes who do not generate blocks under adversity cannot decentralize the network in a way that improves the resistance of censorship. they merely get stuck on the last block their software considered valid.

'To support the network by running a node, select:

Options->Generate Coins'

https://github.com/trottier/original-bitcoin/blob/master/readme.txt

Consider the standard view of the Segwit community; of the importance of 'censorship resistance'.

'supporting' the network by running an archival node with the idea that you will force your ruleset on the network by refusing to change it when the network upgrades ...