1AjUnN…Kqin

To me it was the laser eyes prompting the same thought.

Then: "The protocol is locked. Stiff!"

Now: "yeah Ima unlock it and loot some folks"

If I ever find myself in a court room at Craig's discretion, I'm simply going to boost-pow myself out of my predicament.

You dream about forking, we bankrupt you!

Got around to watch this now. I don't know what else to say than you guys are truly underrated, and I hope you keep it up.

And today they likely have laser eyes and .hodl in their twitter handles. In time, idiots are always parted with their wealth.

I'm abroad and have no access to any coins. Furthermore, I would have you know that $5 is a small price to pay for the privilege of being part of this:

https://twitter.com/michael_saylor/status/1366026059259478022?s=19

It's a possibility. Even though a full node and small blocks let you resist confiscatory tinkering, it does not at all let you escape all costs associated with such attempts. You still have high tx fees, possible double spends, slow confirmations etc..

What coordination though? You run the old code, just as always.

I don't understand you. I showed how you can resist changes to Bitcoin, in self interest, if you have a node and others simultaneously seek profit. I've yet to see anyone convincingly show how you can't.

If it's in my self interest not to accept getting debased, obviously this is true for others as well. Do you think they all happily install the latest client version with code that hurts them?

Yes, it's very hard to transact for a while if you are on the minority fork.

Well, maybe. But it doesnt change the fact that you can attempt to resist bad changes to Bitcoin if you have a full node, whereas you can't if you don't. At least to my understanding.

What correct code? It's just the old code that everyone ran. The debasers are the ones forking off when they run new confiscatory code.

All it takes is a few exchanges running old code for profit, a few miners mining old chain txs for profit, and coin holders using old chain in order not to be debased. I don't really see what's so complicated about all this.

It's just profit seeking and cost minimization. Social media campaigns are besides the point. They are not necessary for me to not want to lose money.

Imagine a hashpower majority going for a hypothetical 50% debasement, enriching themselves. If the cost to me resisting is <50%, thats what I'm doing. It means staying on the old chain, bidding for miners to put txs in blocks by upping the tx fee.

The "watching battlefield" analogy shows only one side of it all; the participants in it are fighting for coins I and others subjectively value. And I value debasement as a net negative.

The market sets prices. High prices of non-diluted coins can eventually have miners go around eachothers' backs, as they like profits. You are in for short term disruptions, but that doesn't mean resistance is impossible.

If some party wants to arbitrarily increase the supply of money, you know what's pretty neat? The ability to run a node and say no to the debasement.

Hours of Theory of Bitcoin vids summarized in one twetch:

CSW: "now, this is where people go wrong..."
RXC: "so, what you are saying is..."

Number go up.

Currently too BSV poor to watch the latest @17294. My profit seeking has failed me and I'm relegated to watching Twetch soon memes.

Italian chef kiss

this is amazing

Many Swedes now think not locking down was a mistake as well. People want to give away their freedom and crush the economy just because the year was as bad as the wonderful 2012. It's insane.

2020 was the 7th least deadly year in Sweden since 1968 (and likely ever), on a per capita basis. Official statistics.

Inform your neighbors.

BTC or BSV people supporting lawsuits against peaceful opponents simply having another vision for Bitcoin, can never be my friends.