1A8qc8…ezhE
1A8qc85m7E4CadxJWgd6YWgtbpcdmmezhE
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 406 Posts
Activity
Reposted
satonakamoto 5.6y
Please like our first Twetch.
We are doing a Youtube demo about Twetch for the Spanish speaking community.
Believe it or not... this is a good thing. The longer it stays in a specific price range the more comfortable people get with it and the less risky it appears in the eyes of people who are on the fence. I’m cool with it because I enjoy buying it. 😂
I’ve been thinking the same-thing! I have a position in BSV that I hold and add to no matter what the price and market sentiment is. So I’ll continue buying but I know eventually we will be in a bear market. I don’t even want to sell to buy back cheaper.
But why would you have invested so much money into such a speculative asset? It could have went to zero at a moments notice. Even if you went 50/50 on both it still was extremely risky. You had a 50/50 shot but made the right call at the wrong time.
I feel like Centbee doesn’t get enough recognition in this space. I really like their wallet and they are doing so much behind the scenes.
https://youtu.be/8FZMoOGoZAU
If he dumped then he would have bankrupted so many innocent people.
Okay so when are you suing the thousands of YouTube influencers and Twitter influencers that told you BTC would be a million dollars by now? You’re just some rich guy trying to make money for doing nothing! 😂 do you contribute anything to bitcoin?
BSV is not part of a private company! A private company uses BSV. Massive massive massive massive massive difference!
The lightning network takes place off chain. It changes the bitcoin protocol and the transactions are controlled by a third party. The BTC protocol isn’t decentralized anymore because it doesn’t follow the original protocol that was decentralized.
Bitcoin (BSV) as a protocol doesn’t need leadership but to protect the remnant of bitcoin that is left (BSV) there needs to be TEMPORARY leadership until the system outgrows it then there should be NO leadership.
Decentralization is a computer science term regarding the robustness of a system. BSV is an electronic peer to peer cash system that follows the bitcoin protocol. When the protocol gets changed then the asset is not bitcoin. BSV follows the protocol.
Just because big players are stepping up and getting involved does not make bitcoin (BSV) centralized. It’s a computer science term about the robustness of a system. Totallyyyy different! If it did then BTC has wayyyyy more big players.
Hold up!!! Bitcoin (BSV) is an electronic peer to peer cash system... not part of a company. There are companies that make use of bitcoin as an asset but bitcoin is not part of any company. There are companies that have influence but that is different.
Every company that will ever exist will have self contained services and rules that make them centralized so of course TAAL will have centralization or else they wouldn’t exist as a company and would disappear into thin air. All companies are centralized.
It’s not a crime. Lol should you have had to pay him money if you made a bunch of money on a BSV pump? No. It’s not a crime because BTC and BSV aren’t even stocks. This is a speculative market, no returns. 🤣
No. Grown adults make their own decisions. No one forced you to sell all of your BTC to make speculative bets on a speculative asset. You could have split 50/50. You made a guess and picked the right choice at the wrong time.
I don’t understand what you would sue for? You didn’t lose any BTC or BSV... you still had the same amount from when you purchased as when you sold... their speculative value changed but not the amount of the asset that you held.
Since when do pumps equal success? Didn’t Bitconnect pump before it shutdown? XNS pumped 9x in one week and then shutdown like a week later and went to zero. Who told you that pumps equal success? Lol they lied to you. Pumps equal eventual dumps. 🤯
This a good point, perhaps I should have chosen a different food to use as an example. 😂 they just always think that the price needs to rise so they can buy some hot wings or else bitcoin (BSV) isn’t doing well. Like there is no connection in real life.
Who said anything about rocket science (rocket science isn’t that difficult btw, I took a couple astronomy and engineering classes when I was in college)? The price matches the utility right now so any pump... would result in a... dump... so... ...🤷🏽♂️
Decentralization is a computer science term regarding robustness of a network. Kyc has nothing to do with decentralization. Kyc is for identification. Eventually kyc will be mandatory on most platforms.
Please explain how the price of BSV rising so you can sell it for fiat to buy pizza rolls and beer has anything to do with bitcoin actually succeeding? I don’t see the connection. All I see is bitcoin being used as it’s ecosystem expands.
🤦🏽♂️ I don’t see how the price of BSV rising has anything to do with bitcoin succeeding right now. Please explain how the price rising so you can sell for fiat currency means that BSV is succeeding? How do your fiat gains mean BSV is doing well?
Do you actually build anything or do you just look at price everyday? If the price rises people will sell and it will fall and if the price falls people will buy. Why can’t you get past that? It’s a market, these things happen. Who cares about CMC?
Why do people who hate BSV talk about CSW way way way more often than people who use and support BSV? It’s like some creepy fascination they have with him. There are a couple people in BSV that mention him (too much) but most of us don’t (and don’t care).
If BSV rocketed up in price... what would sustain it? The infrastructure that would be required for bitcoin to maintain a high price hasn’t been built yet. BTC is able to maintain a high price because it’s a funnel for fiat right now. Too early for BSV.
Which part is wishful thinking? I said that projects which have risen 20x will have violent corrections in a bear market and that BSV barely has anything to correct from in a bear market. Which part of that is wishful thinking? Projects correcting?