Fredrik Bergman Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

Maybe the notion the enterprise level capital and adoption comes first has to be revised. Just maybe the debate really have to be settled amongst ordinary people why BSV is the real rebellion. No easy task with all the pros, cons, nuances and implications.

/trolltoll @39 $2

Can you copy/paste these once more and say why my question is flawed? That should be fast and not to hard.

Remember I havent claimed that it wont be periods of in-/deflation with Bitcoin only that its anticipated being neutral to this fact which is good.

You are not the one to learn anyone anything, you dont even take a stand point for whats true because you know you cant answer ONE question about your own logic then. Instead you want be understood without even trying to explain and call others arrogant?

You are just avoiding to answer the question out of one simple reason...

Think about the opposite of not recovering lost coins. Can we agree on that it would be inflationary if the system accidentally could create more than the set 21m units? Logically it then would be deflationary if the system accidentally could lose coins.

I haven’t said that details doesn’t matter rather I think the opposite applies. It’s really simple, the question will be answered either way, you can’t have both. Makeup your mind, answer and stop avoiding the the inevitable conclusion from it.

Speed limit...

So let’s turn it around, do you mean that it would be better that lost coins weren’t recovered and that wouldn’t add unbalanced deflationary pressure in the system? If not what are we discussing? Did you read CSWs article?

My concept? You are stating the concept, a straw man, but you are wrong again. If it’s not exact expected it will add to inflation/deflation. Your concept fails.

Here comes the ad hominem... nerd!

Again, since its very unlikely I guess it would be inflationary but only to the extent balancing the aggregated deflation during those 81 years. Hypothetically finding 1000units is more probable, less inflationary and would hardly make a dent in the chart.

You are the one starting the discourse... dick, really?

You were the one adding the constrains, I merely speculated in the impacts, remember?

Do you mean that its speculation not a point that deflation and inflation is equally bad for the economy? Which is better in that case and why? The last part is a straw man and irrelevant.

You should think it though. What did I put in your mouth? I haven’t claimed it’s perfect, only that less in-/deflation is better than more why recovering lost coins is better than not again without saying how they are recovered is good.

Thx for keeping at it, adding unassociated context about conflict being a bad course of discussion!

Am I? You’re arguing with your self here. I really don’t understand that you can’t get that keeping the circulating units at 21m is the neutral in-/deflation stance, I.e recovering lost coins is good but without saying how they are recovered is good.

Repeating that I am wrong won’t make it so. You haven’t shown any such flaw. I said that its only inflationary if unexpected and you said I claim the devaluing of the USD was fully expected and therefor not inflationary. Not the same thing.

No it’s only inflationary if it’s unexpected which brute forcing 1million coins momentarily would be because it’s very unlikely. Otherwise it’s just balancing earlier deflation adding stability which is good.

You cant find my claim but it was summarized two posts back? Why would you assume I “require” (?) conflict, aren’t you actually projecting? Thx for your context!

@15671
(Does it work here also?)
Despite you being very convincing I think I’ll keep my bet on Craig...

Maybe there is another reason it’s impossible for you to argue against my claim beside me being wrong... But it’s not easy to understand if you can’t read.

How is your reading comprehension?How is deflation bad for my (?) economy? You seem to pull some kind of straw man here. What do you think I have said that you don’t agree with? Is your point that deflation is ”good”? Can you be more cleari and specific?

👀

In Swedistan one of the few things we still got that’s good is the water quality, because the weather sucks and it always rains in the overwhelming darkness, so a soda streamer is already working overtime here!

By riding a ordinary non electrical bicycle like a normal person? However they should also trade their Twinkie consumption expenditure for BSV (not financial advice!)

Well it should be a law against it, no fatties with BMI over 30 allowed on any electrical bicycles! 🐽

Is this a questioning of any of my claims? How is this related to the current topic and status of the discussion. Is there any conflict?

I seemed? Since I read the article, thanks to BSV King, I’m quite clear that I’m not. You argued against my initial take that it could be solved by scripts which wouldn’t work for already lost coins. What’s your point?

You pulling a straw man since I have said no such thing. And it’s currently irrelevant.