pelaezj1 Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

Patterns are recognized and converge. Let me say something controversial: many in the world of fake Bitcoin (BTC) and the cryptocurrency industry still wonder what the hell happened on October 10, 2025, but we; the followers of Satoshi Nakamoto; knew it a quite in advance, first years ago (Core coins airdrop never will up to $100K + inflation) then with octuber's cucumber operation. The time had come to harvest, to gather the fattened tokens received in the most famous Core coin airdrop, which broke the digital signature chain. Reality is written day by day; that is why it is called the "present"—because it is a gift. Now we must ask ourselves whether the arrival of autumn is a time to harvest or to sow. https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1972540270786031682?s=20

Your comment opens up an interesting debate, as we could ask the same question regarding every image generated by AI language models, every article written by AI, or every piece of code. Have the companies developing these models asked the original creators of the content, text, or code for permission to train their models? Not yet, but eventually, intellectual property and copyright lawsuits will reach the courts, and they will be required to make micropayments to the original creators. Now, returning to NFTs—which consist of public content that anyone can download and re-inscribe on the same blockchain or on alternative blockchains—we come to your question regarding whether the original designer granted permission to those imitating or modifying the illustrations. I assume the answer is no; they did not ask for permission.
Such disputes can easily be resolved using the timestamp provided by Bitcoin with each inscription; this makes it possible to determine when the original content was inscribed, whether using the 1Sat protocol or the protocol used for the original inscription (such as the Sigil protocol).
3dordi functions as a tool that helps users construct transactions using the 1Sat protocol and broadcast them to the network, rather than as a platform that approves or disapproves of the content being inscribed. This is similar to how Bitcoin miners do not act as judges deciding whether to accept or reject specific content within transaction payloads—they simply validate whether the transaction itself is valid. Consequently, 3dordi operates without requiring permission for use; following Bitcoin's core principle, responsibility rests with the user who signs the transaction. To assist consumers or collectors, I have implemented a public commenting feature for each item, allowing for comments such as "This is not original," "It was inscribed previously," and so on. Each collection has a unique ID and a timestamp that helps users identify copies, serving as a form of community moderation rather than centralized moderation—the latter of which would require significant resources to verify intellectual property or copyright regarding the content.