haha. Take their narrative away and it still happened. We need to filter the 'news' from the 'views' ;)
Owen Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.
14e6U2kkpeZ9iCatVmJfxUbTiN2LxzNhSE
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 259 Posts
Activity
Grounds for excommunication? @43771
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/24/europe/german-clergy-same-sex-marriage-scli-intl/index.html
Chinese spies off retired Irish millitary officials bitcoin in return for secrets.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/02841d06-aac3-11eb-972f-15a4ff2ab1d7?shareToken=67ee08564668845dc655efd7b428e47f
It's human nature but with the internet and the speed information (or disinformation) spreads means ratger than having a small group of weird people over there that everyone jokes about we all know people who have been mentally corrupted by it.
its not weird at all. If one person was told to donate because an NFT was being given to people who donated to a specific thing then the buthurt people are right. If that happened its indefencible.
Did it happen? I have no idea
Looking at the talking down to people asking reasonable questions about the whole NFT thing reminds me of Max Keiser after the Maxcoin thing.
Probably wont be on twetch for a while
make a streamanity video outlining your concerns. I'll pay to watch it.
lol. I doubt it but still silly to cause anomosity among users. I dont see any benefit to creating distrust.
to me the lock has no value but it seems to have to others.
If you think insiders are gaming the community (Im not here long enough to know who the insiders are) why would you bother sticking around?
Twetch is not BSV
would probably be easier and a lot less contentious if NFTs were sold for 1bitcoin to fund development rather than triggering some users.
youre overstating it slightly. I dont remember a lock in the white paper but it looks as though many of the community are annoyed about insider dealings. If that narrative gets out twetch is finished before it starts
if nobody wants to buy them how much are they worth?
If they were doing some insider thing why would the people left out fund the corruption?
doesnt matter who knew. The holders dont set the value.
Congrats mate. I hope the better half is doing well.
Did anyone watch the Jimmy Song and Frances Coppola debate?
Probably the most entertaining thing I've seen in years.
Reposted
twetch#6475 5.5y
I am releasing some characters i created as a collection of tokens for 420.
4 x characters to collect.
420,000,000 in total
105,000,000 minted of each character.
5,000,000 of each will be given out as airdrops - Branch and leave your RelayX handle
yeah, same. I hate that f'ing frog.
maybe they just need competition? A lot of people seem to think twetch is the end goal and not a stepping stone.
save us a slice.
for kentucky zone...... amirite? or even on the right path?
The information you have would make you a candidate to manage a seed investment fund that financed the next wave of apps on BSV.
Devs get paid first on other projects in the crypto space. On BSV they have to risk their own time/capital to build something
people who follow influencers are followers not leaders.
How do you attract or inspire leaders to build out further infrastructure?
I think you need a pot of capital ready to be deployed to attract them to BSV.
Reposted
twetch#3375 5.5y
No, I'm not concerned with new users. I'm concerned with improving the users we already have. .
would be cool to have a bid side of the market too.
But does it help with onboarding new users?
Purse.io , Bitwage and Bitpay were three fantastic tools for increasing the userbase. BSV doesnt have anything like that. We have games and twetch.
what efficency do you think can be achieved while people have to pay almost 5% to buy and sell BSV and then hope the price doesnt decline.
Western Unions market is there for the taking if the onboard offboard costs were reduced.
I cant follow the twetch account. Anyone having the same issue?