Mr. Word Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

Web 2.5

Poe’s law

If you think about it, there’s nothing that isn’t an NFT

Oh yeah well actually we’ve been making NFTs every time we send an email, take that ethereum

It could all be L1, that’s the only valuable thing worth attempting here

It’s actually global state that is atomically composable between apps and also globally addressable
No composition, no defi
No global addressing, no defi

And before you say anything UTXO points are specifically not the kind of addressable you need because it’s transient.

I liked the one about how it sounds like BSD

An no UTXO and key hashes aren’t an addressing scheme for purposes of composables. It’s a subtle issue...
https://github.com/mr-word/manadocs-public/blob/master/for-bsv-devs.md

Almost

@8202 <- only other person that seems to get it

Yeah your wallet’s gonna be great, do you have a stateful overlay with proper composability yet?

Someone put a EVM into a bitbus channel ffs. “OP_RETURN” lmao

95% right. BSV needs outsiders like this that have a clue more than outsiders need BSV people to repeat irrelevant craigisms to them

This poll has a correct answr

On BitCoin every “no” is actually a “cope”. Get on my level

For the last time, spoofing and wash trading are not the same. Wash trading is perfectly kosher, it just means you can’t realize corresponding losses until the next year.

Whoa every block is like a transaction and every transaction is like a block
Words have no meaning therefore nothing can be bad

If you don’t get it or don’t agree I don’t have time to explain it to you

POS systems try to direct MEV to stakeholders, while BSV tries to eliminate it altogether.

I think his point is that they’re not really in competition, since they will constrain blocks so the least powerful validator can handle it. More sophisticated POS algos let stakeholders control this cutoff, but the validators still aren’t competing

Twetch is good because it generates responses for controversial statements, like (You)s on the chans. Anti-echochamber mechanics

Sage advice. Much more reliable to buy BSV with AMM gains from eth network, than try to make gains from BSV.

Also 2c and 5c transactions for post/like is subtle but brilliant

Could also be perceived as insurance, if they don’t like BSV but can’t predict Craig’s court outcomes

The “principle” is subjective and therefore what it “really” is is defined by whoever controls the repository. If what you said were true, there would not be forks at all.

Weeks? Don’t strawman, it takes an hour max. If they think it’s worthless, slippage is not relevant. This miner chose to leave hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table. Very expensive signaling.

I’m glad we agree miners don’t choose the rules. nChain has and does.
If Xoken and nChain ran different rules, which one would keep the name BSV? How exactly would that get resolved? Not by hash power, as we’ve seen.