Mr. Word Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

“If gold turned to lead” another retroactive narrative shift to justify current agenda — Satoshi originally made this statement in the context of 2-of-2 multisig in lieu of escrow.

Close enough... https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm

Getting warmer, can you think of any organization that records everything generated by all the companies you mentioned, put together

me irl

How about an org that records all activity generated by all of the above? It might require special secret hardware attached to internet backbone...

Who can think of an organization that specializes in recording everything forever in a highly scalable manner

Thanks I paid a lot for it

I used to be @6334

If you can’t beat them, join their psyop

“Don’t you know BSV is a five eyes glow op to take control of cryptocurrency systems” as if this isn’t bullish for BSV...

BSV exists to establish a legal framework for freezing money on POW chains.

“Take care of the downside and the upside will take care of itself”

Another retroactive justification for present day agenda. Satoshi said “issued collectively by the network” back in the day. They need a certain legal framing now to do what they want to do.

Sounds to me like something made up to avoid handing keys over early. SSSS can be done after the fact and you can pretend you never had the original, only the shards

Looking forward to seeing wtf an “expiration” on shamir secret sharing scheme looks like

Nobody is attacking you, just calmly pointing out when goalposts get moved. Nobody disagrees with your latest position

Yeah agreed, I was responding more to CSW’s complaints about complaints.

His latest tweet suggests otherwise

So is BSV yet here we are

They know if they acknowledge that they ban people for purely political reasons it would be far more devastating for their business. Hence cries of “he was organizing an insurrection!”

As it stands they are trying to pretend it wasn’t politically motivated by accusing Ali of criminal behavior, this is why they are being called out and boycotted.

It’s not clear. Organizing protests is not criminal, if the protest becomes a riot it is not automatically the organizer’s fault. Again, this is a bad precedent because by your logic provocateurs could be used to nip any protest in the bud.

Of course they are free to refuse service, but their justification is just factually inaccurate. It would be more honest if they said they want to distance themselves from it rather than accusing Ali of doing something illegal when he didn’t.

Both Ali and BLM are innocent. Freedom of assembly is part of the 1st amendment. If people commit crimes at these riots those people get charged. By your reasoning no protest would ever be allowed because provocateurs could come in and make it violent.

Boycotts are a legitimate form of protest, nobody is demanding moneybutton reinstate service, they are just spreading the word that moneybutton sucks

Everyone I know from NYC is trying to leave