13VQqy…jmTL
13VQqycwc8o619XCJ8UDuU4m6c5JyTjmTL
- 0 Following
- 0 Followers
- 111 Posts
Activity
Where can I gamble with my spare BSV?
imagine something as simple as a typo where you want to just delete and repost with typo fixed. it's cleaner than to have a typo version of a twetch and the correct version...
okay so instead of using the word "delete" then it should let people "self-moderate" their twetches to hide a twetch from appearing on twetch
Okay I get the point about not possible to delete -- but is that how Twetch the website is fetching the data? I presume that if someone posts childporn or something Twetch censors it from its server, even if they can't delete it from BSV chain
The behaviour of the text box to twetch is weird --- Home/End, ctrl+backspace don't behave as expected
No embedded videos
Only 1 picture allowed at a time
Can't paste pictures into the textbox
No polls
Only weapon is TrollToll, need more
still waiting for my ban tho
Okay I've done a day or so worth of testing of Twetch:
- No DMing = meh
- No deleting twetches = meh
- Over-reliant on central wallets
- Economics too stringent, strangles activity
- Can it scale to Twitter-level activity?
- Srsly necessary to use BSV?!?
Agreed. Just when you think there is information which decides it one way or another then there is someone else providing information that leads to more confusion and questions. It will be historic how this plays out.
Reposted
twetch#6218 6.4y
at this point it has become impossible to follow the case. so much fake news or half truths. cant wait for the case to end.
Good sport!
It's an interesting usecase for BSV and it's been fun playing with it. It seems Calvin Ayre, Craig Wright & co are in it for the long-haul on BSV so will keep following developments.
Interesting take from lawyer -- fair enough -- the court will decide in the case what is significant and what is not.
twetch#2083 6.4y
研究这些地址在法律上意义并不大，因为博士是被告，对这些地址的存在和比特币的数量没有举证义务。它们或真或假或半真半假，都对案件本身没有任何影响。
https://twetch.app/t/677ec7c9672ef927913e72923f8996c26ab6f34aacfe1a0820f28440ef67771c
Reposted
twetch#3561 6.4y
Either A. he was faking being intelligent and knowledgeable in the past for some unknown reason, or B. he is faking being erratic now or C. multiple people under one account (unlikely). Between A & B one is easier to fake than the other.
No sir -- I have used Liquid and I am critical of Blockstream in many regards. But I am critical of everything. Eli Afram says the above list is perhaps NOT CSW's, so just asking questions about signatures using addresses on list and learning here, friend.
Reposted
twetch#24065 6.4y
Note: I can't say for sure if Craig Wright has committed perjury -- it is just a question of whether the signing of 145 addresses by someone apparently who isn't Craig Wright is a form of cryptographically proven perjury. That's for a court to decide!
hmm, what are you suggesting? different people or that he had a change in personality or what?
Reposted
twetch#3561 6.4y
This is a good timeline of Craig:
https://ohmysatoshi.com/satoshitimeline
Contrast his posts now and how he used to talk before the Gizmodo article in this forum:
https://seclists.org/basics/2008/Mar/144
haha awesome! i love the fire and passion, gentlemen!
Some new information on the Kleiman case with Wright:
- Did CSW claim to own the keys or is it just through the Tulip Trust?
- Is it possible there were false positives on the list and these 145 addresses don't destroy broader claims?
Learning more...
twetch#6218 6.4y
Judge Bruce Reinhart in Kleiman case: "...I have previously found that Dr. Wright gave perjured testimony in my presence.” https://cryptolydian.com/judge-criticizes-craig-wright-for-perjury-forged-papers/